CeibaqAs of2026-06-15MethodROOT method v0.3ModelROOT model v0.3.1MaturityPROOF OF CONCEPTDemonstration modeView as

Portfolio

Jurisdictional Compliance Layer · Government / jurisdiction (REDD+)

Native format: JNR · ART-TREES 2.0 · output: Jurisdictional Annual Degradation Report

Places under license
2
active subscriptions
Area under coverage
7.38M ha
Σ area × coverage
Aggregate sub-canopy degradation
0.51 Δ %/yr
improving y-o-y
Registry status
2 PENDING
ART-TREES 2.0
Maturity
Pre-pilot
proof of concept
Your places

Alerts and forward-looking signals shown are illustrative — simulation, pre-pilot; no node deployed yet. Claim values are quantified and independently verifiable, not “verified” or “certified.”

Recommended actions
Generate Jurisdictional Annual Degradation Report
JNR · ART-TREES 2.0 · all places
ReadyGenerate report
Submit FREL crosswalk to MINAM
Loreto jurisdiction (demo polygon) · NFMS / FREL baseline
Pending MINAM
Request ART-TREES 2.0 review
CI-methodology acceptance · 2 places
Pending
Produce GEDI benchmark
Independent benchmark vs GEDI L4A · pilot-gated
Not produced
Refresh expired report
Jenaro Herrera Concession · valid-to 2026-06-15
Expired 15dRefresh report
Refresh expired report
Loreto jurisdiction (demo polygon) · valid-to 2026-05-30
Expired 31dRefresh report
Cross-place comparison
PlaceSub-canopy degradationCIvs satCarbonStrataCoverageRegistry
Jenaro Herrera Concession0.42 Δ %/yr±31%±60%142 tC/ha338%ART-TREES 2.0: PENDING
Loreto jurisdiction (demo polygon)0.51 Δ %/yr±34%±61%128 tC/ha421%ART-TREES 2.0: PENDING

«vs sat» = CI of free satellite-only (optical/SAR) vs CeibaQ in-situ+LiDAR — the sub-canopy wedge. Quantified & independently verifiable; pre-pilot design targets.